Trump / FBI / Russians

She is leading the narrative for the Democratic Party and she is a socialist. I wonder... also she is a moron and people like seeing/hearing people say stupid things when they don’t realize how stupid they are.

 

I respectfully disagree.

The narrative leader for the dems is TBD.

There is an internal struggle in the party. Whomever wins the pres. nomination will set the narrative for 2020, however the main objective is to defeat the incumbent.

 

Go to any “news” site right now and let me know if there is not currently a story about her on the home screen. Check them for a week and let me know how many times there was not a single story about her. My bet is that it will be a small number.

 

Jackass gets $8,700 / month in taxpayer money from his pension

 

Sure I'll bite.

Left:
NPR.org: zero
Huffpost.com: 2

Right:
Foxnews.com: 3 (including their top story at the moment)
Breitbart.com: 3

Conclusion: the right media is far more interested in AOC than the left media. AOC is interesting but Pelosi runs the party at the moment.

Remind me to check again in a week.

 

So 75% of “news” sources have stories about a junior member of the house....

 

The media is about clicks now, nothing really else. AOC gets clicks. Heck we talk about her more than anyone except for Trump.

 

That was the point I was making. Thank you.

 

An idiot getting by on sound bytes, seems to be the norm now in politics.

 

And Bitch Tits cutting and pasting every article talking about those sound bites seems to be the norm now on SI

 

Perhaps, Kid, perhaps. I believe that DaveD has valid points, though.

The Conservatives don't fear Ocasio-Cortez. They mock her because she's an absolute idiot. The LSM picks up on this mockery & twists it so that it fits their Dem narrative. Cortez didn't understand the AMZN deal whatsoever (got ripped by even de Blasio) & how many jobs would be created in NYC, due to her hatred of capitalism. INSANE.

The Dems are the ones who fear Ocasio-Cortez. Obviously. Why hasn't she been removed from the powerful Financial Services Committee? A freshman Congresswoman from Nowhereville with absolutely zero experience is placed by her Dem Masters on the Financial Services Committee?? And why hasn't the freshman Dem musloid anti-Semite from Dearborn been removed from the Foreign Affairs Committee?? Are you shiiiiting me?? These are the people the Dems selected to provide policy for America. wtf wtf wtf

This isn't sound public policy for we the sheeple. This is merely more grandstanding, vote pimping by the Dems, grabbing headlines.

Ocasio-Cortez is also an anti-Semite. Same as her bud the Christian-hating musloid biiiiiitch from Dearborn. And what does the Dem party do? Censure either one ? Oh noooooo. They pass a BS statement saying anti-Semitism is bad, kids. The Dems have zero accountability for their actions.

The Dems don't have a platform. They have no foreign policy. No economic policy. No nothing, except hatred for Trump. That is their only narrative. Hate, hate, hate. TDS on an exponential level.

How do the Dems complain about the most incredible American economy in history?
How do the Dems complain about the emasculation of crazy rocket buoy Kim?
How do the Dems complain about the strongest America in many years?

TDS
TDS
TDS

There are several regular posters who dominate this treade with their name-calling, sicko vitriolic (look it up nnynnnnj), illogical, irrational hatred of Trump. We all know who they are: nyynnnj, headhigh, toejam banned whatever & of course bead of mercury buoy kylie, oh and sigourney too. Five guys who just love to argue here on SI cause their partners, male & female, dominate them.

And here's all you need to know:
THE FACTS DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS, SOCIALISTA BUOYS

 

Even Greenpeace says Ocasio-Cortez is an asshat

 

The former president of Greenpeace Canada slammed Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a “pompous little twit” for advocating the so-called Green New Deal.

“You don’t have a plan to grow food for 8 billion people without fossil fuels, or get food into the cities. Horses?” the scientist and author tweeted.

“If fossil fuels were banned every tree in the world would be cut down for fuel for cooking and heating. You would bring about mass death,” added Moore.

He also ripped into AOC for describing climate change as “our World War II.”

“Isn’t @AOC a bit young to talk about WW2? It was Hell & more than 60 million died,” he penned.

“It’s her @GND that would be worse than WW2. Imagine no fuel for cars, trucks, tractors, combines, harvesters, power-plants, ships, aircraft, etc. Transport of people & goods would grind to a halt.”

Moore also assailed Ocasio-Cortez as a “garden-variety hypocrite,” in response to a report in The Post that she used gas-guzzling private vehicles instead of taking the subway.

“You’re just a garden-variety hypocrite like the others. And you have ZERO expertise at any of the things you pretend to know,” said Moore.

 

So, yah, keep on with your sucking up to these jackasses like Cortez who claim to be leaders.
You are maniacally bleating prior to your slaughter by your own Komrades.

THE FACTS DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS

 

Not At All!!

 

Last Friday, President Trump unveiled his grand strategy for American prosperity: the 2019 Trade Policy Agenda. This forward-looking report from the US Trade Representative maps out America’s deliverance from the bad deals, weak guardrails and sluggish growth that have handicapped decades of international trade. It fulfills a key pledge made on the 2016 campaign trail: “The era of economic surrender will finally be over . . . under a Trump presidency, American workers will finally have a President to protect them and fight for them.”

On Jan. 20, 2017, the Trump administration inherited a broken global trade system in which overseas competitors and governments stole our technology, unfairly subsidized national champions and dumped their products into our markets. US multinationals responded by offshoring jobs and leaving good workers and American manufacturing strongholds in the lurch. After China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, it failed to fully abide by WTO rules and the damage grew. The US would subsequently shutter over 70,000 factories and lose millions of manufacturing jobs.

In its first two years, the Trump administration has rapidly turned this situation around.

The International Trade Commission has more than doubled its investigations of foreign subsidies harming American firms compared to President Barack Obama’s final two years. As a result of these investigations, the United States has imposed tariffs on targeted agricultural and manufactured goods to offset unfair trade practices even as President Trump has taken bold action to protect America’s steel and aluminum producers in the interests of national security.

The ongoing China negotiations likewise show that the administration’s trade strategy is highly effective in encouraging countries to address their most egregious trade practices. Under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, the United States has imposed tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese imports. Now the Chinese government is finally engaging in serious negotiations to address cyber intrusions into our business networks, intellectual property theft, forced technology transfer, currency practices and excessive subsidies for state-owned enterprises.

The president’s trade policy is also making incredible progress in opening new export markets. In the past year alone, the US Trade Representative has announced plans to negotiate new trade deals with the European Union, Britain and Japan — which collectively accounted for $350 billion of American exports in 2017.

President Trump’s successful campaign pledge to renegotiate NAFTA — America’s largest trade deal — likewise provides a long overdue makeover and modernization.

When NAFTA went into effect in 1994, the Institute for International Economics forecast the creation of 170,000 US jobs and a trade balance with Mexico that would remain in surplus well into the 2000s. Instead, America’s trade deficit with Mexico ballooned even as Mexico’s own workers saw little benefit. Meanwhile, NAFTA suppressed the wage growth of blue-collar US workers in highly affected industries and incentivized American companies to offshore their production to Mexico.

The new United States Mexico Canada Agreement will improve copyright and patent protections for US companies and entrepreneurs while encouraging auto manufacturers to shift production to the United States. Ford, Fiat Chrysler, and Volkswagen have all expanded their production in the United States in anticipation of USMCA passage. These announcements suggest that the USMCA stands poised to create thousands of American jobs — if only Congress ratifies the new agreement in the coming months.

All of these leaps and bounds forward are possible because of President Trump’s relentless commitment to — and grand strategy for — revitalizing American trade. No president in American history has pursued fairness and reciprocity with more resolve — and none has had a point man as effective as US Trade Representative Robert E. Lighthizer. The 2019 Trade Policy Agenda is simply another example of their dedication to American economic and national security.

The results are undeniable: Last year, the United States created 284,000 new manufacturing jobs, the largest increase in 21 years. Today, our nation is growing faster than any other G-7 country and generating new opportunities for America’s blue-collar workers and middle-class families who have too often been left behind.

In 2019, the Trump administration will continue leveling the playing field, balancing international trade relationships and securing strong deals. Thanks to promises made and kept by President Trump, the trade future has never looked brighter for America.
- - Navarro