We all got along until clown came around. He is like that guy in reservoir dogs that cut off the cops ear and basically ruined the robbery.
So the question remains....do Trump haters (Hillary supporters, feminists, day f@gs, Burn Baby Burn believers, BLM supporters, demoRats, globalists)....really think he's playing for the Russians? You may not like the guy or his politics but to believe a nationalist agenda means he working for the Russians seems absurd and is absurd. Let me explain since it's really so simple. This whole russian thing is a pay back by the Media (at the hand of Obama and the Dems) for the whole birther movement Trump spearheaded. Obama is a wolf in sheep's clothing. People don't understand that. You don't climb the ranks of the democratic party without being a vindictive gangster phony. Trump is real. Faults and all. What you see is what you get. With other politicians (both sides of the isle)...what you see is CERTAINLY NOT what you get.
Let's change tack for just a sec and ask a related question: What exactly did Flynn do that is considered to be so serious? It's already been proven that he discussed Obama's sanctions with a Russian ambassador, whom the MSM and Dems frequently allege to be a possible spy. And it's also known that Flynn's discussions about the sanctions were unlawful, due to the fact that he and Trump were not in office yet. So, unless I'm missing something, what we have to this point is Flynn illegally spoke about Obama's sanctions with a Russian ambassador. While illegal, the sanctions being talked about are the main focus of the investigation. And for that, Flynn should pay the price. But it's sanctions ffs, nothing of significance regarding national security were allegedly discussed. Just sanctions. So what's the big deal, and how do they plan on tying this incident in with the whole Russian collusion thing? Without more information or evidence, it seems like a desperate witch hunt.
maybe burned someone on a set wave? Seriously.....i heard from a friend up north that Mike Flynn used to charge Rhode Island, out on all of the big days. Maybe still does? Anyway, surfers aren't to be trusted with vital security matters. We've got waves on our mind.
IDK KR. I think you're wrong aboot Flynn. Not defending the guy and I haven't followed the situation closely, but a quick google search will tell you that neither the AG nor the CIA have any evidence of Flynn doing anything illegal. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...of-flynns-calls-dont-show-criminal-wrongdoing All the hoopla aboot Flynn/Trump/Russia is just part of the Democratic backed MSM smear campaign to influence the general population into thinking Trump is an untrustworthy bad guy. You have to remember and if you already didn't know Obama legalized the use of govt propaganda to be inserted into the MSM. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-...ntering-disinformation-and-propaganda-act-law
Once the Dems and the media started equating this to Nixon and Watergate, we knew they are desperate to find something to stick Trump with. And that with zero evidence. And I thought Obama told Romney in a debate that Russia is "no problem". Politics sucks. It is what will tear the USA apart. "United we stand, divided we fall".
Liberal pussie here. First time caller, long time listener. Part of the problem with Flynn is that he was working for Turkey while also working on Trump's campaign. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/10/us/politics/michael-flynn-turkey.html?_r=0 As far as the Russia connection goes, I don't understand why you wouldn't want it to be investigated. Trump definitely has ties to Russia*. Did he collude with the Russians to win the election? I don't think so. Did the Russian's attempt to influence the election? Most definitely. *From what I understand, Trump has trouble getting financing in the US b/c he's declared bankruptcy six times. So a lot of his projects have been financed by Russian money. http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-trump-property/ The obvious question to ask is why did the Russians want him to win? Just because he's a businessman who will be more amenable to lifting sanctions and overlooking human rights abuses? Maybe. Or maybe because he's been in business with the Russians, helping them launder their stolen riches for years (buying real estate is a great way to launder money). And maybe he stands to gain financially by working with them. He is a businessman after all. It's not like he divested himself from his businesses or anything logical like that. Where there's smoke there's fire, and there's a $hit-ton of smoke surrounding this administration. Just because he says what you want him to say doesn't mean he's going to do what you want him to do. Liberal pussie signing off.
I have avoided this conversation because I don't really participate in these discussions on this site, and I am to the left of the center. I don't want anything to do with another political fight, so I am giving you an answer because you asked, not to engage in a discussion to change each other's minds. I can tell you without a doubt that I believe that Russia framed this election for Trump. Mind you, this is from a self-admitted liberal who loathes trump, has never needed assistance of any kind (in fact make enough that I'm likely to see a tax break), does not like Hillary or what's become of my party, does support BLM at its core, and believes that people of all gender and sexual orientation should be treated equally, so feel free to disregard it. I will not, however, engage in political argument, simply answering a question out of respect for another surfer.
Russians wanted him to win because they support Syria and Hillary was drooling to bomb some brownies also, citing NYT? thats a straight deep state- CIA mouthpiece that promotes the oligarchy misfits, supports BLM...wow what a complete cuck
Obama openly supported Macron and Anti-Brexit campaigns. Would you say he was interfering in those free elections? Obama and the "swamp" have a vested interest in the proliferation of globalism and they go out there an openly meddle in other countries free elections. I know of no instance where Russia was "openly" endorsing one side over the other.
You are from The Peoples Republic of Massachusetts--we would expect nothing else. And you quoted both Reuters AND NYT!! Why not Maos "Little Red Book"?? Say "hi" to Liawatha for me.
I think I was pretty clear that I wouldn't engage in political argument and was strictly answering a question.
If the question was NOT addressed directly to you, then you are engaging in political discourse. That makes you a target for the opposition, whether you like it or not. Asshole. bwahahahahaha!!!
Would you say he was interfering in those free elections? No argument. You answered one question. I posed another. Being left or right is one's choice, but being honest with yourself should be required.
I've never been on this forum without opposition, nor has anyone else. Someone asked for an opinion that no one else on this site seems to believe exists, or likely is too afraid of harassment for being different from the ultra cons group dynamic. I gave an opinion knowing I'd be thrashed and didn't care because I have real friends, a real career, a real life and no status to lose here or on any other forum, I don't really have the time for them. I could not, however have imagined something as hurtful and personally devastating as being called an a$$hole. Your intellect has 'trumped' mine, Хорошая работа! Please go back to what I can only assume from reading a few of your other posts is a very happy and prosperous life.
Sure do! If you read my last post, you'll see that the negative responses I got have turned me into an ultra conservative.
Now you're just being a triggered tool. Typical liberal...withers in the face of facts. Talk about being a fooking stereotype.