Your book has betrayed you by not letting you think before you express their thoughts. Yours are lens flares, mine aren't. I can tell the difference, and you just want a pay check, Shilla.
Albert Einstein (a noteworthy science motherf*cker) was a proponent of the static universe theory, until Eddie Hubble proved him wrong in the 20's. It's comforting to know the small dose of toxic poison we receive from a serving of GMO goodness is harmless. Try forecasting the accumulation of toxic poison we'll consume over time, through countless "safe" doses, and the repercussions that will have. Scientifically speaking of course; the best thing to do is trust the companies that are spending boat loads of cash to keep us uninformed about the toxic poison they're feeding us. Close your eyes, cover your ears, open your mouth, and swallow.
Pretty poor example. One scientist isn't going to get everything right. Good thing there are thousands of scientists involved in GMO research. Once again, dose makes the poison. You get a little dose of toxic material every time you drink water. You are also confusing GMOs with glyphosate. Not all GMOs are grown with use of glyphosate, and GMOs are not considered carcinogenic by the World Health Organization. Companies are lobbying to keep labeling off, because they know it will hurt their profits (as people will take the label as a warning). I don't trust in companies. I trust in the mounds of independent research on GMOs, which far outweighs the research done on organic crops using organic pesticides.
And you have the scientific competence of a flat earther. Your slander towards me doesn't change that.
And you have the mouth power of an industrial vacuum cleaner. Flat earthers believe there's and object hurtling towards the earth. They're probably not worried if it's coming from the side. and it's not slander if it's true Shillah.
Regardless on which side of the debate you are on with GMOs don't you think they should be labeled as such with country of origin? Any thing less is simply a repulsive attempt to decieve consumers.IMHO
Actually, the majority of the science community was on board with the static universe theory, and Albert even factored his theory of relativity into it. Mmmmmmmmm, delicious Fluoride, and Chlorine. Dang, I can't remember, why did Hitler load the water with Fluoride in his concentration camps? 1 dose is safe, and thousands of doses over time is still safe? Accumulation is not a factor? I don't buy that. Sorry. The only thing I'm confused about is why you're in love with Monsanto, Tepco, and BP. F*ck that, and tough sh!t! We have the right to know, and decide for ourselves.
You're probably a lot worse than anything I could write, so that's called a compliment. You're Welcome!.
Money talks. Those big companies have no problem hiring a dollar an hour troll to push policies and throw tin hat conspiracy around. If GMOs are so great, why not label? If they're safe how come some poor countries are burning off all GMO crops. Because of YouTube videos, Right Shillah?
forced labeling has to do with the "implied" danger of GMOs...hence the argument from both sides. Whether right or wrong that is "the why". It's like the opposite of Organic Labeling which allows that industry to charge a premium for their products as long as they are certified, they can label as such. I have actually visited a couple of farms in HI with an organic certifier...learned a lot and they actually did test samples from various parts of the farm in a thorough manner (from what I could tell anyway) Aren't the burnings committed by "crop terrorist"?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hungary-destroys-all-monsanto-gmo-corn-fields/5342913 http://otherworldsarepossible.org/haitian-farmers-commit-burning-monsanto-hybrid-seeds http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/africa/starving-zimbabwe-rejects-gm-maize http://www.thenation.com/article/twenty-six-countries-ban-gmos-why-wont-us/
Freedom of choice is what you want. Freedom from choice is what you get [video=youtube;dVGINIsLnqU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVGINIsLnqU[/video]
More slander. Chich, you are disgusting and ignorant. Why are you in love with wild conspiracy theories and tabloid news sources? Are you so uneducated and feeling so inadequate that you want to think you know more that people who spend their lives actually researching topics? Even at your age senility isn't a good excuse for the nonsense. Please present evidence that I am paid by anyone other than the German automotive company I have claimed to work for many times, or cease your relentless slandering. I don't even own one share of big oil, big agriculture, or even the petrochemical industry.
Nothing! I do my part by picking up schitt at the beach and around my community. What do you do? throw yer trash around while touting job creation? Brew, You only got one schtick. Giving a false bio of yourself only makes it more unbelievable.
Now we are going to dive into the unwarranted ignorant fluoride fear? You know very well I am talking about straight H20, which is only safe at certain doses. Wait, fluoride is found naturally in ground water. I thought natural meant 100% safe. Fluoride contaminated water can be used to water organic crops. Where is your fear of that being passed on to the consumer? Orly? I love them? Try posting using facts, and stop making sh1t up. I am definitely not a fan of BP, especially after their handling of the Gulf oil spill. Monsanto, well, I am indifferent. I don't believe they are evil, like the conspiritards claim. I also know, from years of working in large companies, that they aren't just there to save the world. I am not going to defend a company just to defend a company. The only thing I defend is scientific advancement, where research continually proves no harm. I am mostly just tired of the hypocritical bullsh1t from the internet warriors with no scientific background. These people latch on to any crap spewed by natural news, while ignoring piles of actual research (oh, I forgot you can't trust real scientists, because they are too mainstream). These people also demand more and more research on the safety of GMOs, while ignoring the complete lack of evidence that many chemicals used in organic farming are completely untested. If we are going to make this whole thing fair in the market, we should be labeling organic foods with a warning that they could contain chemicals that are harmful, as they have not been tested. Only then, would I even consider labeling all GMOs. Or you could just use a bit of intelligence and assume that anything that doesn't claim to be organic or GMO-free likely contains some GMOs. It isn't hard to research products. If YOU really cared that much, a simple email to the companies requesting a list of their GMO free products would probably go a long way.