Dear Friends, I must preface this e-mail by saying this; I opposed the Iraq War from the beginning, I despise the Neo-Cons, I never voted for George Bush and if I am a Republican, I am a Lincoln-Roosevelt Republican, not a Bush-Cheney Republican. Though I hate John McCain, I love America more (Or at least, I "intensely despise" McCain). What do these things have to do with one another? Wel,l that's what I'd like to explain. Who is this man named Barack Hussein Obama? What does he stand for? And considering his many flip-flops (go to http://massdiscussion.blogspot.com/2008/06/collection-of-obama-flip-flops.html), what are his real positions? I suggest that we examine what Obama said he believed before he became a national celebrity and the truth became politically inconvenient. (http://time-blog.com/real_clear_politics/2007/12/the_obama_questionnaire.html) Barack Hussein Obama Jr. was born to Barack Hussein Obama Sr., an agnostic Muslim communist, and Ann Dunham, an atheist Marxist feminist. Despite Obama's whitewashing of his fathers' true character (In "Dreams of My Father"), Obama Sr. abandoned him and his mother to pursue a degree at Harvard, turning down another offer that would have kept his family together. Obama Jr. was raised alternately by his mother and his mother's grandparents when the former ditched him to pursue her career traveling the world. While in Hawaii, Obama's early influences were communist revolutionary Frantz Fanon and black supremacist and socialist Malcolm X, both of whom he read with great interest and quoted with much approval. Obama's personal mentor while he lived in Hawaii was a man name Frank Marshall Davis, a communist and a revolutionary poet. (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=75478) Shortly after Obama moved to Chicago, he began attending Trinity United Methodist Church pastored by Jeremiah Wright. For over 20 years Barack Hussein Obama listened to sermons laced with racist "black liberation theology." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_liberation_theology) And though you may respond by saying that John Hagee supported John McCain, John McCain did not belong to Hagee's church or sit in Hagee's church pews for 20 years. Obama only disowned Wright after he was "found out" by the mass media. Obama at first denied ever hearing anything controversial in Wright's sermons and then admitted that he did in his "More Perfect Union" speech in Philadelphia in March 2008. Obama made some important connections while in Chicago, linking himself with the slumlord Tony Rezko who has been indicted on charges of wire fraud, bribery, money laundering, and attempted extortion. Obama paid him political favors while serving in the Illinois state Senate while Rezko got Obama a lucrative land deal. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Rezko#Legal_troubles) Obama also connected himself with Bill Ayers, founder of the Marxist terrorist "Weather Underground", and his wife Bernadine Dohrn, also a former leader of Weather Underground. Regardless of what the Obama campaign ads state, saying "Obama was only 8 years old when Ayers committed his crimes," that's not the point. Ayers and Dohrn are unrepentant terrorists, and Obama accepted money and support from them in his campaigns for the Illinois state Senate. Despite what the Obama campaign claims, Obama and Ayers are still on good terms and have met with each other numerous times post-911, with Ayers lamenting he didn't do enough terrorism. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_ayers#Obama-Ayers_Controversy) For those of you who think an inexperienced Obama will surround himself with good advisers, I ask you to read over his list of associates a few more times. On the international front Obama supported "democratic socialist" (politically correct communist) Raila Amollo Odinga of the ODM (Orange Democratic Movement), the son of communist former Kenyan Vice-President Jaramogi Ajuma Oginga Odinga (whom Obama Sr. supported), for the presidency of Kenya when he visited Kenya. (To read the ODM platform go to http://kenyavotes.org/node/107) The endorsements Barack Obama's campaign will not advertise are his endorsements from Kim Jong-Ill, Castro, Chavez, Ortega, Hamas, Achmenijad, Farrakhan, and the New Black Panther Party. If you don't know who any of these men are, I suggest you look them up. This brings me to the issue of "change." The word "change," along with "unity" are both by-word slogans of Marxist radical Saul Alinsky. ( http://fromtheduke.blogspot.com/2008/05/saul-alinsky-another-obama-mentor-from.html) To read Alinsky's book and Obama's textbook for change, "Rules For Radicals" go to the pro-Alinsky website if you like (http://latter-rain.com/ltrain/alinski.htm). So what is my point? Obama will bring change alright. Am I saying he will bring a Marxist or Communist revolution to America? In a sense I guess, but he won't call it that. Maybe they'll call it the generic version instead "democratic socialism." For those of you who don't believe me, an argument that you might relate to is this: go to http://www.ontheissues.org/senate/Barack_Obama.htm and ask yourselves this question, with a Democrat filibuster proof super-majority in the Senate, how much damage, I mean "change", will they be able to do. For those of you who find that prospect a potential paradise on Earth, remember Clinton in 1993-1994, NAFTA and the WTO. The Democrats are just as Globalist as the Republicans, the only difference is that the democrats would surrender our sovereign rights to the United Nations before acting. In a "World Democracy" such as the UN seeks to create, it will be like 200 wolves and 1 sheep deciding what's for dinner, I think you can figure out who's the sheep. (To read more on the globalism of Barack Obama, go to http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20070701faessay86401/barack-obama/renewing-american-leadership.html) Another practical argument is this, with Barack Obama proposing a trillion dollars in new spending (go tohttp://www.usnews.com/blogs/capital-commerce/2008/2/14/obamas-trillion-dollar-spending-plan.html) and proposing "middle class" tax cuts, where is he going to get the money? Increased government spending, lower taxes? It sounds like the Bush-Cheney fiscal policy. Obama will not raise taxes on his rich friends (the Democrats are after all the party of the rich (http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NmE4NWY3Yjc4YmJmMDJmOGU0ZmQwNGE0MjNlMDJiZTY=) So how will he raise the money for all this new spending? Probably by raising the capital gains tax. For those of you who say, "Great, 'soak the rich,'" ponder this question. With no trade barriers keeping American companies here (Obama will not change that, read his own campaign's assurances to the Free Traders), do you honestly expect them to stay here under those circumstances? Guess what that means? More jobs lost to overseas. In closing, I'm not asking you to vote for McCain, for the sake of my future, your children's future and your grandchildren or nephews and nieces future, I'm asking you NOT to vote for Obama (and a vote for McCain is just that). I will make this prediction now. If Barack Obama is elected President and the Democrats achieve a filibuster proof super-majority in the Senate, one of the first things they will do is pass amnesty for the 13-20 million illegal immigrants here (A Democratic majority will never let McCain get credit for this, even if he wants it). Those 13-20 million will not only depress the wages of American workers, they will also form a solid Democrat voting bloc for the foreseeable future. Obama's presidency will be the worst and most devastating in American history, and despite this fact, he will probably win reelection in 2012, having secured a lock on the presidency thanks to those grateful naturalized illegal aliens. The Democrats will continue to win election after election, driving this country further and further into the ground. By 2050 or sooner, America will be a minority-majority country (Not to sound "racist," but can we honestly expect America to remain a First World nation with a Third World population?), there will be no middle class to speak of, and the best situation we can hope for is to be a new "Brazil." That is, to be a highly stratified country with a small elite, no middle class and a large underclass, that is, of course, if America is even around by then. She may after all divide into various successor states like the Roman Empire did, with concentrated ethnic and immigrant populations forming new nations in various regions. If I sound like an alarmist, I am. The best situation we can hope for is 4 years of McCain and someone new on the horizon to turn things around (And I'm not talking about Sarah Palin, Joe Biden or Hillary Clinton). This election may hold the fate of America in its hands. I am a forgiving person, but our posterity may not be. Let us not imagine the day when they curse our names for what we did to them by our action or inaction. Thank you for reading.